Alvaro Xiong

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing element of the project. This is particularly true in the case of an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected. However, instruction often feels a bit limited. Students usually ask whether they must write summaries of books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project. Literature reviews are not written to show how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you understand the current research related to the subject you are researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect the research directions with your theory. Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature Before you write anything, it is crucial to consider the reasons the section exists in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three main functions. First, it shows that the subject matter you've chosen is one that has been studied in the past and has a scientific significance. The second is that it assists you to find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. It also provides the foundation for your research goals and methods. Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous assignments or web-based sources. This can result in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU requires original work even when examining existing studies. What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. At the same time it is recommended that students write in a simple way. too much to be avoided. In an ignou project the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding. The expectation is to look over books, research papers journals, reports, as well as government publications that are related to your subject. The concentration should be on the studies closely related to your area of study. For instance, if the project is focusing on the financial performance of banks the literature review should focus on prior research about financial ratios the performance of banks, profitability analysis and risk assessment. Selecting Relevant Literature Sources One mistake that students often make is choosing too many different sources. It's more about quality than quantity. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business in the range of 15 to 20 powerful sources are generally enough as long as they're carefully chosen. Good sources include academic journals well-known books written by renowned writers, RBI publication, reports from the government, as well as university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided. It is always best to choose recent studies that are from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in. Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter A well-organized and organized chapter enhances understanding and perception. Instead of writing random summaries, break up each literature overview into sensible sections. You can structure the chapter in accordance with themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables investigated. For example, one section could discuss research related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and another one on operational efficiency. This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see the difference between taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it. Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review The writing style must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary words. IGNOU MCOM project writing services [http://redfernoralhistory.org/] places emphasis on clarity over complexity. Each study you discuss should contain the name of author, year of study, purpose, method, and major findings. However, do not list them in a formal manner. You should try to link one study with the other. For instance, after discussing one study, you could refer to how an author's findings were supported or opposed those findings. This method of comparison adds complexity to your ignou project. Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes A common error is to write the literature review as an academic chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research. Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written by you in your own words. Reading from the source shows understanding, and using copying can show dependency. They also fail to link books to their own research focus. The research you refer to should have a clear connection with your objectives for your project. Links Literature Review with Research Gap One of the key results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or indicate areas where further research is needed. After having discussed a myriad of studies it's possible that studies focused on large corporations, while small firms were neglected. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, while primary data was scarce. This is a reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your program could appear to be repetitive. Use of Citations and Referencing In writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but quality is more important than consistency. Every study discussed must appear in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity. Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. Citations in text work better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project. Length of Review of Literature Chapter Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should last. There's no rule of thumb however, for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred and two thousand words. The length should depend on how complex the topic is. The more expansive topic requires greater research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but deeper discussions. Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks. Example of Literature Review Writing Approach Instead of writing as this The author analyzed banking's performance and obtained good results Write as this The author A conducted a study on banking performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who also emphasized the importance of operating efficiency in boosting returns to banks. This is an approach that demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is considered important in an ignou MCOM project. Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get refused or delayed because of copied literature reviews. Although you may refer to previous research, the language has to be distinctly yours. Use plagiarism detection tools if you can and then rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than perfect copied. Final Review Before Submission Before submitting your ignou mcom project, reread the entire literature review. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives. Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes then you're on the correct path. Closing Thoughts Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM project can be a challenge at first especially for those who return back to their academics after a period of. But once you understand that it is about analysis and connections rather than memorization, the task becomes easier to manage. Spend time reading, think, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly on your final product and often can be the difference in an average submission and a powerful one.