Raymundo Batts

For many students in IGNOU, the review of literature is often the most difficult part of the project work. This is especially true for students working on an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected. However, instruction often feels a bit limited. Students generally ask whether they must write summaries of books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotes. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project. Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much material you have read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the prior work on your field and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluators look closely at the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link ideas with research direction. Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature Before writing anything, however, it is essential to know why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three primary functions. It first shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been previously studied and has a scientific significance. Second, it aids you detect gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline of your research goals and methods. Students often view this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or even from online sources. This can result in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing the results of existing studies. What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. But any explanation that is not basic is discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding. You're required to read research papers, books and reports, as well as journals as well as government publications that are related in your research topic. The main focus should be on those studies relevant to your research area. For instance, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks Your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously regarding financial ratios the performance of banks, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation. Selecting Relevant Literature Sources One common mistake students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For a project in ignou anywhere between fifteen and twenty high-quality sources are often enough in the event that they are carefully selected. Some good sources are academic journals popular books written by well-known authors RBI publishing, state reports and university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided. Always choose studies that are recent that are from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they are fundamental in their nature. Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter A well-organized chapter increases understanding and perception. Instead of writing random summaries, break up the literature review into sensible sections. It is possible to organize the chapter based on themes, time period, methodology, or variables researched. For example, one section may examine studies that pertain to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, and yet another is focused on operating efficiency. This structure helps evaluators understand the difference between replicating content but are actually analyzing it. Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary terms. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity. Each study you discuss should be listed with the author's name, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and significant findings. It is not necessary to list them mechanically. You should try to link one study to another. For instance, after discussing an article, you can mention how another author supported the results or countered them. This sort of comparative approach will add the depth of your ignou mcom project. Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes A common error is to compose the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies. Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in you own language. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying implies dependence. Students are also prone to not linking sources to their own research topic. Every study you mention should be clearly connected to your research objectives. Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap One of important result of the study of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or the areas where more study is required. After having discussed a myriad of studies you will notice that the majority of research was focused on large companies in contrast to small businesses being absent. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, but the primary data was scarce. This is why it's the main reason for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your project could seem repetitive. Use of Citations and Referencing When writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however quality is more important than consistency. Each study covered must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity. Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. Citation in text is more effective and looks more professional in an ignou MCOM project. Length of Review of Literature Chapter Students often ask how long the review of literature must last. There's not a standard for length but, for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents in length to 2500 words. The length of the discussion should be based on topic complexity. A broader topic requires additional research while a targeted topic requires fewer, but more in-depth discussions. Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis does not improve marks. Example of Literature Review Writing Approach Instead of writing this way, Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results Write as such Write as this: Author A performed a study examining the performance of banks using financial ratios and concluded that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B who highlighted the role of operation efficiency in improving returns to banks. This type of approach shows the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an MCOM project. Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity IGNOU MCOM Project Writing takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are denied or delayed because of the use of copied literature reviews. Even if you refer to previous studies, the language is yours. Use plagiarism checking tools as possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is superior to copied perfection. Final Review Before Submission Before submitting an ignou mcom project, reread the entire literature review. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, whether the flow is consistent and if the chapter is logically linked to your research objectives. Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reason why my research is important. If the answer is yes then this review of literature is definitely on the right track. Closing Thoughts Reviewing literature for an ignou mcom project could be daunting at first particularly for students returning to university after a gap. But once you recognize that it's about analysis and connection rather than recitation, the challenge is easy to handle. You should take the time to read, think and write with your own voice. That effort reflects clearly on your final product and frequently makes the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. outstanding one.