Rick Alston

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU review, reviewing literature becomes the most confusing element of the project. This is particularly true for those working on the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected. However, the direction often feels a bit limited. Students usually ask whether they require a summation of their books, edit journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that difference can change the quality of the entire project. Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much material you have read. It's written to demonstrate how well you have grasped the literature that is relevant to your field and how your work fits in. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theory with research direction. Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature Before completing any work, it must be understood why this chapter is necessary in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three main purposes. In the first place, it indicates that the area you've selected is one that has been studied in the past and has relevance to academic research. Furthermore, it will help you find gaps or weaknesses in previous studies. Thirdly, it gives you an outline for your research goals and the methodology. Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous projects or from online sources. This practice usually leads to failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing existing studies. What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. But simple explanations are also not recommended. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate. You will be required to read research papers, books Journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate in your research topic. The emphasis should be placed on studies relevant to the research area you are studying. As an example, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should be focused on previous studies concerning financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment. Selecting Relevant Literature Sources The most frequent mistake that students make is picking too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For an ignou-MCOM IGNOU Project Work project anywhere between fifteen and twenty reliable sources will suffice when they're well-chosen. Good sources include academic journals highly regarded books by well-known names, RBI publication, reports from the government, and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided. Always opt for recent studies at least from the last ten years. The older studies may be included only if they are fundamental in way. Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter A well-organized chapter enhances understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide all the reviews of books into sensible sections. You could organize the chapter according to themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables that are studied. For example, one section might focus on studies that relate to the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate upon liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations. This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not copying content but analyzing it. Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Avoid a lot of language and use of jargon. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity. Each study that you talk about must include the name of the author as well as year of study, purpose, method, and principal findings. It is not necessary to list them in a logical manner. Try to connect one study with the other. In the case of discussing one study, you may be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This sort of comparative approach will add greater depth to your project. Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes A common error is to compose the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies. Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying shows dependence. They also fail to link works to their research issue. Each study you reference should have a clear link to your research goals. Links Literature Review with Research Gap One of the most important results of the examination of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas where more study is required. After having discussed a myriad of studies you'll notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations, while small firms were overlooked. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary information was limited. The gap in the picture is the reason for your an ignou project. Without it, your project could appear monotonous. Use of Citations and Referencing When you write a review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection. All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity. Avoid footnotes for literature review. In text citation works better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project. Length of Review of Literature Chapter Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should be. There isn't a set rule but, for an ignou mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred or two thousand words. The length should depend on the subject's complexity. The more expansive topic requires greater research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but more extensive discussions. Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no any analysis doesn't increase marks. Example of Literature Review Writing Approach Instead of writing this way, Author A analyzed the bank's performance and got good results Write like this The author A performed a study examining the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased due to better asset management. This was later validated by Author B who pointed out the importance of operating efficiency in boosting bank returns. This approach displays understanding and analysis, which is appreciated in an MCOM project. Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. However, even if you use previously published studies, the style will have to match your own. Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than perfect copied. Final Review Before Submission Before you submit your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review attentively. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if the flow is logical and if the chapter is logically linked to your research goals. Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes then you're on the correct track. Closing Thoughts Writing a review of literature for an ignou mcom project isn't easy at first in particular for students who are returning into academics after a time off. When you understand that it's focused on connection and analysis rather than memorizing, the job becomes doable. You should take the time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. It is reflected clearly in the final project and often determines the difference between the average submission and a solid one.