Blogs
on April 10, 2026
There's a few options for which setting Battlefield could go next, but the most likely setting is a modern day conflict. A few leaks and rumors on the internet have come out regarding Battlefield 6 , all of which seem to agree the shooter is returning to a contemporary time period. For a series that's done both historical time periods as well as modern war settings, there's definitely positive and negative points for a modern setting if true. Battlefield needs a fresh start, and even though the series started with WWII, a modern setting may be the perfect rest
Back during the peak battle royale craze, practically every shooter that wasn't Fortnite or PUBG wanted to get in on the action. While the explosion of the battle royale craze did spawn some awesome games like Apex Legends and Call of Duty: Warzone , there have been some that just didn't change much and fell flat. One in particular was Battlefield 5 's Firestorm mode, which fizzled out just as soon as it came
During EA Play's 2020 Live showcase, there was an interesting tidbit shared at the end of the show from chief studios officer Laura Miele. Towards the end of the showcase, EA showed off some very early next-gen development footage from EA's first-party development studios like BioWare, Criterion, and DICE. "Our studios are taking their crazy, ambitious ideas and making them real," stated Miele. "Every console generation DICE sets the bar for excellence in audio and visual presentation. We are creating epic battles at a scale and fidelity unlike anything you've experienced before." This is almost certainly in reference to Battlefield 6 , or whatever Battlefield title is currently in the works for 2
Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4 were both based on modern combat , and saw the greatest commercial success prior to the best-selling Battlefield 1 . Plus, modern military has actually advanced incredibly since 2014 with higher usage of drones and autonomous ordnance, so there's plenty of new material for Battlefield 6 to expl
That being said, taking that prototype gameplay at face value, it's clear that EA is inferring these new improvements in player density/fidelity and destruction refinements will be Battlefield 's key factors of success for next-gen . That's certainly not a bad thing, as having large-scale battlefields that evoke a simulation of war is exactly what Battlefield has done best in the past. The only major problem is that Battlefield 6 will need to make sure that these new additions are not just window dressing. These systemic improvements/refinements have to be done with purpose, not just for the sake of being technically impressive without any semblance of gameplay importa
Modern military combat is more popular nowadays compared to historical shooters and the over-saturation of futuristic shooters. Though it's important to note that time period is not going to be the inherent savior of the Battlefield franchise. Most fans would likely argue that World War 2 was not the breaking point for Battlefield 5 , but the severe balancing issues and the content delays were more detrimental. Pair this with the extremely ambitious content plan that was more ironed out than the gameplay itself, and Battlefield 5 's slow and unfortunate passing was sad to see . Battlefield 6 needs to nail down the basics before deciding how to make the game bigger, regardless of whether or not the game is set during 1942 or 2
To do this, Battlefield needs to capitalize on what makes it special , come up with a unique and defining feature, or even both. One major thing that Battlefield 2042 season guide|https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ still has over every other shooter out there is the sheer destruction the Frostbite engine is capable of. Destructible environments have been a mainstay for the franchise since Bad Company 2 , but it's become such a non-factor in recent entries. Emphasizing how destruction can change Battlefield 's battle royale would be a perfect integration of core mechanics with things like mortar strikes, more vehicles, anything to dial in on the chaos Battlefield does b
Rival franchise Call of Duty also did something similar, and has seen phenomenal success with its Modern Warfare reboot. It's not a one-to-one comparison by any means, but it should at least be encouraging for the Battlefield series. The Call of Duty series also put out a WWII shooter in 2017 that, while not exactly as unpopular as Battlefield 5 has become for fans, also had a particularly middling release even for a Call of Duty title. There were a few problems with microtransactions (a prevalent issue back in 2017 for several games) , the weapon and perk variety in multiplayer, and story gripes as well. Then Call of Duty went back to basics with Modern Warfare , and so far has seen great success, not even counting Warzo
Simply put, previous Battlefield games have seen success in a modern setting before so it makes sense to return there. Some of the most popular games in the franchise like Bad Company 1/2 and Battlefield 3/4 each saw great commercial and critical success depicting modern warfare. Battlefield is in a peculiar position it's honestly never really been in before, where the series got its start simulating battles of WWII but has now seen one of its worst-performing games based in WWII . Jumping back to a modern time period, as ironic as it may be, could be exactly what the franchise needs for a comeb